Perpetuity of the Digital Past and the Scales of Legal Justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63939/ajts.q3bzgt57

Keywords:

Digital Memory, Right to be Forgotten, Privacy, Digital Panopticon, Principle of Proportionality

Abstract

This study examines the problematic of privacy in the digital era amid the ongoing tension between the imperative of "digital memory" and the entitlement to the "right to be forgotten." The research investigates the philosophical and epistemological shift brought about by modern technologies, wherein memory has transformed from its selective human paradigm anchored in an existential equilibrium between recollection and forgetting into an extended artificial infrastructure characterized by absolute permanence, infinite replication, and autonomy from human will. The study aims to conceptualize the right to be forgotten as a modern legal mechanism and a philosophical necessity that prevents the fixation of an individual's identity within their past informational footprint, thereby granting them a second chance to reconstruct the self and transcend past negative occurrences. Furthermore, the research highlights the conflict between this right and competing constitutional mandates, such as freedom of expression and the public's right to know, while addressing empirical challenges like the transnational nature of the Internet and the hegemony of Big Tech conglomerates. The study concludes by recommending a paradigm shift from rigid statutory rules to a flexible, judiciary-led approach grounded in the principle of proportionality and ad-hoc evaluation, ultimately balancing the protection of human dignity with the free flow of information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ali Latreche, University Ahmed Draia of Adrar, Adrar, Algeria

    Ali Latreche is a legal scholar affiliated with Ahmed Draia University of Adrar, Algeria. His publications address labour law, trade union freedoms, legal drafting, and the legal and ethical dimensions of digital technologies. His work includes studies on arbitration in Algerian labour law and the linguistic characteristics of legal rules. In the present article, he examines digital memory and the right to be forgotten, focusing on privacy, human dignity, and the balancing of individual rights against the public interest.

References

CJEU, C. o. (2014). Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v AEPD and Mario Costeja González,Case C-131/12, Judgment of 13 May 2014. (CJEU)

MULLA, M. S. (2018). The concept of the right to enter into digital limbo. Kuwait International Law School Journal, 6(Special Supplement, 117-152

Ambrose, M. L. (2013). “It’s About Time: Privacy, Information Life Cycles, and the Right to Be Forgotten”. Stanford Technology Law Review, 369-422

Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. 1958: University of Chicago Press

Ausloos, J. (2020). The Right to Erasure in EU Data Protection Law. Oxford University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198847977.001.0001

Belkeziz, A. (2019). On Digital Culture [Fi al-Thaqafah al-Raqmiyyah]. Center for Arab Unity Studies

Commission, E. (2012). EU Data Protection Reform Speech by Viviane Reding. JRC Report on the Right to be Forgotten (pp. 1-2). European Commission

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet. Yale University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029

González, C. G. (2014). Google Spain SL. Case C-131/12, Judgment of 13 May 2014

Kaur, T. (2024). Right to be forgotten: An evolving right. International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis, 2(7), 19. https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-13576445

Kuner, C. (2013). Transborder Data Flows and Data Privacy Law. Oxford University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674619.001.0001

Mayer-Schönberger, V. D. (2009). The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton University Press

Mbah, G. O. (2022). Data privacy and the right to be forgotten. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 1216-1232. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.2.1079

Nietzsche, F. (1997). On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life, in Untimely Meditations . Cambridge University Press

Ricœur, P. (2004). Memory, History, Forgetting. University of Chicago Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226713465.001.0001

Rosen, J. (2012). The Right to Be Forgotten. Stanford Law Review Online

Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding Privacy. Harvard University Press

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time : The Fault of Epimetheus,. Stanford University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616738

de Terwangne, C. (2013). The right to be forgotten and the informational autonomy in the digital environment (EUR 26434 EN). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/54562

Vilella, S. R. (2025). Indexing and the Right to be Forgotten

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs

Published

2026-11-01

How to Cite

Perpetuity of the Digital Past and the Scales of Legal Justice. (2026). Arabic Journal for Translation Studies, 5(17), 140-160. https://doi.org/10.63939/ajts.q3bzgt57