Accuracy, Risk, and Translator Agency in AI-Assisted Specialised Translation

Eyhab  Bader-Eddin

doi:10.63939/ajts.9sr3gw56

Authors

Eyhab Bader Eddin Dhofar University, Dhofar, Oman Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0096-6334

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63939/ajts.9sr3gw56

Keywords:

AI-Assisted Translation, Human–AI Collaboration, Specialised Translation, Translation Accuracy, Translation Risk, Translator Agency

Abstract

This article discusses the role of human–AI collaboration in specialised translation, focusing on accuracy, risk and translator agency in high-stakes legal, medical, technical, financial and institutional contexts. It critically synthesises recent research on machine translation, large language models, post-editing, terminology management, translation quality and professional agency, using a conceptual and analytical approach. The study does not present primary empirical data; rather, it attempts to establish a framework for assessing machine-generated output within specialised translation workflows. It is theoretically innovative in combining accuracy, risk and agency within a single relational model and demonstrating how each translation decision is shaped by system output, professional judgement and potential consequences. Accuracy is therefore understood as a multidimensional requirement encompassing linguistic, terminological and conceptual precision, as well as consistency, register, genre conventions and functional appropriateness. Risk refers to the potential for output to be inaccurate, incomplete or inadequately validated, resulting in errors that could affect legal interpretation, medical safety, technical procedures, institutional responsibility or end-user decisions. These concepts are presented in a six-dimensional analytical model that includes system contribution, accuracy issue, risk level, translator response, decision rationale and impact on final quality. The article argues that computational tools can be used for drafting, terminological support, reformulation, post-editing and quality assessment, but cannot serve as stand-alone authorities in specialised translation. Translator agency is thus redefined rather than eradicated: the translator must assess, edit or reject system output, explain decisions and take responsibility for the final product. The proposed framework offers a basis for future conceptual, empirical, pedagogical and professional studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Eyhab Bader Eddin, Dhofar University, Dhofar, Oman

Eyhab Bader Eddin, BA, MA, PhD, CL, MCIL, MITI is an applied linguist, poet, interpreter, translator and currently an Assistant Professor of Translation at Dhofar University, Oman. He formerly taught in Syria, Oman, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia on both MA and BA programmes. With a PhD titled ‘Semantic Problems in A. J. Arberry's Translation of the Suspended Odes (Mu'allaqat), he is passionately interested in Classical Arabic and how it can be functionally translated into English. His MA dissertation's title, 'A Comparative Stylistic Study of the Poetry of Gibran Khalil Gibran and James Elroy Flecker', submitted at the University of reading, the UK was an interesting dissertation bringing together literature, and linguistics from a critical standpoint. His research areas of interest are Arabic and English stylistics, translation theory, syntax, translation theory and its application along with Quranic discourse and stylistics. He is interested in Classical Arabic poetry. He published in the fields of linguistics and translation in such refereed journals as Translation Journal, the British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, ZDMG, etc.

References

Benkirane, K., Gongas, L., Pelles, S., Fuchs, N., Darmon, J., Stenetorp, P., Adelani, D. I., & Sánchez, E. (2024). Machine translation hallucination detection for low and high resource languages using large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 (pp. 9647-9665). Association for Computational Linguistics DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.564

Berger, N., Riezler, S., Exel, M., & Huck, M. (2024). Prompting large language models with human error markings for self-correcting machine translation. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (pp. 638-648). European Association for Machine Translation

Dale, D., Voita, E., Lam, J., Hansanti, P., Ropers, C., Kalbassi, E., Gao, C., Barrault, L., & Costa-jussà, M. R. (2023). HalOmi: A manually annotated benchmark for multilingual hallucination and omission detection in machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 638-653). Association for Computational Linguistics DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.42

Guerreiro, N. M., Alves, D., Waldendorf, J., Haddow, B., Birch, A., Colombo, P., & Martins, A. F. T. (2023). Hallucinations in large multilingual translation models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11, 1500-1517. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00615

Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. (2025). Human-centered AI and the future of translation technologies: What professionals think about control and autonomy in the AI era. Information, 16(5), Article 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050387

Kenny, D. (Ed.). (2022). Machine translation for everyone: Empowering users in the age of artificial intelligence. Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6653406

Kocmi, T., & Federmann, C. (2023). Large language models are state-of-the-art evaluators of translation quality. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (pp. 193-203). European Association for Machine Translation

Koneru, S., Exel, M., Huck, M., & Niehues, J. (2023). Contextual refinement of translations: Large language models for sentence and document-level post-editing. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.14855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.148

Moslem, Y., Romani, G., Molaei, M., Haque, R., Kelleher, J. D., & Way, A. (2023). Domain terminology integration into machine translation: Leveraging large language models. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Machine Translation (pp. 902-911). Association for Computational Linguistics DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.wmt-1.82

Muñoz-Miquel, A. (2025). Approaching machine translation in the medical and health field: An exploratory study. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 44, 22-43. https://doi.org/10.26034/cm.jostrans.2025.8453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26034/cm.jostrans.2025.8453

Raunak, V., Sharaf, A., Wang, Y., Awadallah, H. H., & Menezes, A. (2023). Leveraging GPT-4 for automatic translation post-editing. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 (pp. 12009-12024). Association for Computational Linguistics DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.804

Zhu, W., Liu, H., Dong, Q., Xu, J., Huang, S., Kong, L., Chen, J., & Li, L. (2024). Multilingual machine translation with large language models: Empirical results and analysis. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 (pp. 2765-2781). Association for Computational Linguistics DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.176